An Essex-based vet has been suspended from the RCVS register for two months for failing to hold professional indemnity insurance (PII) or equivalent arrangements in compliance with the RCVS Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Surgeons.

Gavel and stethoscope
Anne Mary Mullen has been suspended from the RCVS register for two months. IMAGE: Fotolia/

Anne Mary Mullen appeared before an RCVS disciplinary committee (DC) following a concern raised with the college in 2015 by a member of the public relating to the respondent’s practice.

No PII in place

During the hearing it was determined that, during the relevant time period – from November 2015 to November 2016  – Mrs Mullen was practising, but did not have PII in place – and, therefore, was in breach of the code.

During the hearing, Mrs Mullen, who represented herself, admitted she did not have PII.

She explained she was “ethically and morally opposed to it” as she felt it did not give fair compensation to claimants and she did not know it was a requirement of the RCVS Code of Professional Conduct until she was informed by the college in January 2016.


Mrs Mullen disclosed she kept significant funds in a bank account, but those funds were not specifically earmarked for use in the event of any possible claims, and were also required to pay practice expenses.

She was found guilty of disgraceful conduct in a professional respect.

In mitigation, the DC took into account Mrs Mullen’s long and unblemished career – and the fact she was a sole practitioner who reported challenging personal circumstances and provided a unique service to a niche group of clients.

The full DC hearing can be found on the RCVS’ website.

View your activity >

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Vet suspended from register for lack of indemnity insurance"

Notify of

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
29 days 17 hours ago

Another ridiculous decision by the RCVS DC. Could have just had a warning and now she will what. .. have to close her clinic for two months?? Or get a locum and lose revenue.

Mel Saalfeld
Mel Saalfeld
29 days 16 hours ago

Whilst I can understand the point of view of those who feel that the RCVS’s response was over-zealous, this is not a case of someone who simply forgot to pay for their indemnity, it is someone who very deliberately took the law into their own hands and actively sought not to pay for it. On this basis would it be ok for me to decide that I am “ethically and morally opposed” to paying my VDS subscription, Income Tax, Corporation Tax, National Insurance, Council Tax…..?! We all have obey the rules or face the consequences.


related content

Industry product supplier Vet Direct has gained sole veterinary distribution rights for all Horizon ligation clips sold in the UK.

2 mins

In the third of his posts marking Veterinary Nursing Awareness Month, Gerardo Poli notes how composure, empathy and good communication skills go hand in hand when dealing with angry pet owners.

7 mins

Ellen Lavender discusses recharging the batteries and sampling the natural life in the Pacific Ocean national park.

13 mins

Former vet Warwick Seymour-Hamilton has had his fifth attempt to be restored to the register dismissed by the RCVS disciplinary committee.

2 mins

Hany Elsheikha discusses the clinical impact of key ectoparasites, as well as strategies for effective therapeutic control.

38 mins

The entire staff contingent from the Catterick Garrison branch of Vets4Pets are to tackle the Yorkshire Three Peaks to raise money for Nowzad, a charity that bring dogs back to the UK that have been befriended by Afghanistan-based soldiers.

3 mins