An Essex-based vet has been suspended from the RCVS register for two months for failing to hold professional indemnity insurance (PII) or equivalent arrangements in compliance with the RCVS Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Surgeons.

Gavel and stethoscope
Anne Mary Mullen has been suspended from the RCVS register for two months. IMAGE: Fotolia/

Anne Mary Mullen appeared before an RCVS disciplinary committee (DC) following a concern raised with the college in 2015 by a member of the public relating to the respondent’s practice.

No PII in place

During the hearing it was determined that, during the relevant time period – from November 2015 to November 2016  – Mrs Mullen was practising, but did not have PII in place – and, therefore, was in breach of the code.

During the hearing, Mrs Mullen, who represented herself, admitted she did not have PII.

She explained she was “ethically and morally opposed to it” as she felt it did not give fair compensation to claimants and she did not know it was a requirement of the RCVS Code of Professional Conduct until she was informed by the college in January 2016.


Mrs Mullen disclosed she kept significant funds in a bank account, but those funds were not specifically earmarked for use in the event of any possible claims, and were also required to pay practice expenses.

She was found guilty of disgraceful conduct in a professional respect.

In mitigation, the DC took into account Mrs Mullen’s long and unblemished career – and the fact she was a sole practitioner who reported challenging personal circumstances and provided a unique service to a niche group of clients.

The full DC hearing can be found on the RCVS’ website.

View your activity >

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Vet suspended from register for lack of indemnity insurance"

Notify of

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
2 months 21 hours ago

Another ridiculous decision by the RCVS DC. Could have just had a warning and now she will what. .. have to close her clinic for two months?? Or get a locum and lose revenue.

Mel Saalfeld
Mel Saalfeld
2 months 20 hours ago

Whilst I can understand the point of view of those who feel that the RCVS’s response was over-zealous, this is not a case of someone who simply forgot to pay for their indemnity, it is someone who very deliberately took the law into their own hands and actively sought not to pay for it. On this basis would it be ok for me to decide that I am “ethically and morally opposed” to paying my VDS subscription, Income Tax, Corporation Tax, National Insurance, Council Tax…..?! We all have obey the rules or face the consequences.


related content

The RCVS disciplinary committee has ended an inquiry against a Hampshire-based vet after it found no case of “serious” professional misconduct against him – despite finding the majority of charges against him proved.

8 mins

BEVA has defended the work equine vets do to safeguard horse welfare, stating “profit must not be confused with a lack of passion”.

5 mins

A vet appointment has hailed the start of a new era for a Northumberland town’s oldest veterinary practice.

4 mins

Most practices have emerged from the dark ages, when postcards and the odd phone call were the only ways of communicating with clients. Dr Ernie Ward explains how modern methods are driving revenue growth, enhancing patient care and boosting client satisfaction.

25 mins

The difficulties faced by practices trying to recruit experienced vets has led an increasing number to turn to new graduates. Taking on inexperienced vets can be a challenge, but when it works, the rewards to both employer and employee are substantial, says Jenny Stuart.

10 mins

Vicky Robinson discusses how practice teams can work together to drive dental initiatives, the form they should take and the impact they can have on the bottom line.

16 mins