Is choosing a fully tracked degree like putting all your eggs in one basket?
Is choosing a fully tracked degree like putting all your eggs in one basket?

Earlier this week, I was asked my opinion on the proposal of “tracked” veterinary degrees.

All the time, the bigwigs are trying to think of innovative ways to change veterinary education to produce the best prepared graduates they can for the big wide world. The new idea compromises the suggestion of either “partially tracked” or “fully tracked” degrees.

Partial tracking would involve allowing students to take an elective to allow them to focus on a particular species or discipline. A multi-species exam would be taken and graduates would still qualify to practise in all species.

Fully tracked degrees would mean not all areas of veterinary medicine were covered during the course; the students would choose to study a limited number of species and would take an exam specific to their choice. Therefore, graduates would only be able to practise in the area or species they qualified for.

There are obviously advantages and disadvantages for both ideas. Partial tracking would allow students to take an interest in one area more than others, but still keep their options open on graduation. A possible downside would depend on the proportion of the course that is elective. If choosing to study to a greater depth in one species or discipline would become detrimental to the rest of their studies, then would it just result in the production of students who are slightly stronger in one area but considerably weaker in the other aspects of the profession?

At first, fully tracking seems like a fantastic idea – graduates would be very knowledgeable in their field of qualification. They would be highly specialised and so extremely valuable to the field into which they wish to proceed.

But what if they changed their minds? Currently, it doesn’t matter if you start your veterinary degree thinking you’d like to be a farm vet but finish it thinking you never want to see a cow again. Taking a fully tracked degree would mean you’d be stuck with the path you chose – and how would a vet ever go into mixed practice if this were the case?

I think there is a lot of debate yet to be had on this subject. Personally, as a student, I wouldn’t choose to fully track because I wouldn’t want to have to put all my eggs in one basket just yet. Partially tracking at the later stages of the course could be beneficial though, when we all have a better idea of where we’d like to end up.

View your activity >

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of


related content

More than 500 delegates looked forward at CVS' annual conference at the Birmingham Metropole Hotel earlier this month.

4 mins

While on the farm rotation at university, Jordan's inexperience lead her to discuss when things go wrong and examine the "safety net" provided by the Veterinary Defence Society.

10 mins

Digital media has revolutionised the way many vets and VNs fulfil their CPD obligations. Accessing learning online is often cheaper, faster and more convenient than traditional modalities. So, is there still a case to be made for event-based learning? James Westgate reports.

16 mins

It is vital vets are valued equally, irrespective of gender, said the BVA's new president in response to a report that found women returning to work after having children fell even further behind men in earning power.

4 mins

The 18th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress addressed some of the big issues in the field, from joint disease and bone abnormalities to reconstructive surgery.

5 mins

UK veterinary practices will struggle to retain staff unless they are willing to embrace a part-time working culture, warns equine vet Anna Hammond.

4 mins