Should the RCVS’ Practice Standards Scheme be mandatory? Images © and Keito.

As reported in Veterinary Times (February 9 issue), the RCVS would like all veterinary practices to comply with at least the lower rung of the Practice Standards Scheme (PSS).

This is a lovely headline, and a worthy ideal. I think a mandatory system will level a very uneven playing field, allowing practices to compete, particularly at the lower price-point end of the market.

You know there’s a “but” coming, don’t you?

BUT… I can’t help thinking this might be counterproductive, may well increase costs to practices – and therefore owners – and make use of a system that doesn’t work very well in the first place.

I’ve worked in a broad spectrum of practices – some of the low-budget, one-vet lock-up practices, in particular, would make an inspector’s toes curl (half-inch thick dust in the consulting room, anyone?) – and it cannot be good to allow this kind of practice to compete with a higher-quality practice down the road?

It does make me wonder: when you consider the number of people who have animals and who cannot (or won’t) afford veterinary services, there must be a place in the standards scheme for a welfare level of practice.

accredited-practice-logo-quoteBy “welfare level” I mean one geared towards alleviating pain and suffering, with less emphasis on work-ups, which often means taking a try-it-and-see approach to diagnosis. A practice standard at that level would emphasise behaviours (such as cleanliness, ethics and informed consent) over equipment and staff.

I’m also not sure the PSS I have experienced from my side of the inspection really does what it sets out to do. All you can say is that a practice met the standards required of its level of practice on a particular day. When the inspectors are expected, everyone is on their best behaviour and the practice is often sparkling and polished. When the inspectors aren’t around, how do we know the practice is just as clean and organised?

There needs to be ongoing verification between the bigger visits or the standards inspections are only a measure of how well a practice “scrubs up”.

View your activity >

Leave a Reply

1 Comment on "Practice Standards Scheme compulsion"

Notify of

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Chris Pearson
Chris Pearson
1 year 6 months ago
I do not disagree that the RCVS should be involved in establishing a standard. I, however, think that that standard should be the lowest required to ensure a standard compatible with what is appropriate. Do not forget that we are expected to provide medical and surgical services to ALL animals and I have done much good work in a field! Pimping up practices to look like a posh doctors surgery or operating theatre is all very well but it will price our services out of the reach of a significant number of people and therefore animals. Welfare obliges us to… Read more »

related content

Despite never meeting him or even speaking to him, the late, great Bob Michell had a profound influence on Nick Marsh's veterinary career and on his outlook in general.

10 mins

RVN Jane Davidson argues vet nurses need to hit the CPD benchmark laid down by their human health colleagues, claiming journal clubs are one solution to do so.

8 mins

An RCVS disciplinary committee hearing has been adjourned indefinitely after respondent Roger Meacock agreed to amend his website to make it compliant with his professional responsibilities.

3 mins

The BVA is looking for nominations for the 2017-18 junior vice-president post, as well as three members of its newly formed electoral college.

5 mins

The college celebrated its latest milestone with a weekend of events including an ethical debate, talks, a film screening and a glamorous gala dinner.

4 mins

The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons is accepting nominations from vets and VNs who wish to stand as candidates in next year’s council elections.

5 mins