John Lewis has become the first pet insurance provider to say it will not enforce a £200 “penalty” for non-urgent referrals outside the RSA preferred referral network.

Pet insurance
“We will allow our customers to make a choice without being penalised,” says John Lewis Pet Insurance. Image: rosinka79 / Fotolia.

In a statement, a spokesman for John Lewis Pet Insurance said: “The RSA referral vet network has been established to give customers access to a trusted network of vets that provide a high standard of service and value for money.

“However, we do understand in some cases where the primary vet recommends a referral practice and circumstances dictate our nearest network partner is not suitable, we will allow our customers to make a choice without being penalised.

“If the treatment in question is covered under the policy, there will be no additional fee charged, regardless of whether they choose to use a network practice.”

Brands that do charge the £200 are MoreThan, Tesco and Argos. One retailer that partners with the RSA – Marks and Spencer (M&S) – has still not signed up to the network.

Welcome decision

John Lewis Insurance
“John Lewis’ stance is clearly a positive step in restoring customer choice,” said a Vets for Choice spokesman.

The John Lewis decision has been welcomed by Vets for Choice, a coalition of eight referral practices that oppose the RSA preferred referral network model, which, they argue, could restrict a primary vet’s duty to refer an animal for the best medical treatment.

A spokesman for Vets for Choice said: “While we are still opposed to the idea of the network as an unnecessarily restrictive measure in general, John Lewis’ stance is clearly a positive step in restoring customer choice.

“Those with John Lewis Pet Insurance who wish to use a vet outside of the RSA model will never be hit with unfair and unexpected penalties at the point of referral. Customers and first opinion vets should always be able to use the vet they feel offers the most appropriate care for their animal without fear of financial penalty.

“How easy it is to choose non-preferred practitioners under the John Lewis claims process remains to be seen and we will continue to watch this closely.”

  • For the full article, including a response from RSA, see the 5 September edition of Veterinary Times.

 

View your activity >

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
avatar

wpDiscuz

related content

Millions of dogs could enjoy longer, healthier lives if vets were to change their approach to the treatment of osteoarthritis, according to an orthopaedic specialist.

4 mins

Rory O’Connor offers practical advice for VNs to prevent mental health issues occurring – and to ensure you don’t suffer in silence.

19 mins

VN Times editor Rebecca Hubbard discovers what the future holds for a trio of veterinary nurses who have been appointed to the VPMA’s board.

25 mins

Jordan Sinclair reveals what she learned after spending a couple of days with the ophthalmology service at the University of Glasgow Small Animal Hospital.

8 mins

Peter Edmondson discusses the role of vets in reducing antibiotic use for this condition, as well as common difficulties and ways of managing perceived treatment failure.

25 mins

Sarah Heath looks at the emotional motivation for dog bites and explains the profession’s role in improving understanding of canine mental health.

23 mins